I’m back

’m back, but not really. In that sense, I guess Christians might assume that I’m “resurrected.” I’ve just stopped by to say that I probably won’t be back any time soon. The book isn’t done (it’s not about religion or philosophy, BTW, for those of you who’ve written asking. It doesn’t relate to this blog at all except that I happen to have written both of them. It’s my ninth book, and is about a subject related to my day job). I’ve just been too busy to make much progress on it. Tomorrow, all that changes. I’m taking off a few weeks to work on it.

I don’t know when or if I’ll ever post here regularly again. It will have to wait until at least after the book is done, and I don’t know when that will be. I’m going to take down the re-run posts I put up since 9/15, and I won’t be posting any others. I hope to get back here someday, but I just can’t afford the distraction right now.

Some random parting thoughts:

Beyoncé can upgrade me anytime she wants to. About all that’s missing from that commercial is her going down on a silver phallus with the word “upgrade” on the side. What the heck were her handlers thinking when they let her do that one? She seriously looks like she’s about to give it up for DirecTV.

Dolly Parton looks creepier by the day. She really ought to lay off the plastic surgery. She’s starting to look like Tammy Faye’s deranged sister.

I’m in love with Marie Osmond. I gave up on my love for her back in the 70s, realizing it just wasn’t meant to be. Then I saw a clip the other day of her fainting on Dancing With The Stars and realized how hot she is--40-something or not. She was just gorgeous, absolutely stunning. They said something about her having recently lost a lot of weight. Whatever the case, she looks fabulous. And she’s newly single. Almost makes me want to convert to Mormonism...

For my money, Temple Whore (http://templewhore.blogspot.com/) is still the best religion blogger on the web. I still read her regularly and still feel her blog is a masterpiece of simple elegance. Her witty writing, the wonderfully clean, sleek design of the blog itself, and, yes, those gorgeous pictures, make hers the place to be. She represents all that’s good about religion blogs and blogging in general.

Van Halen is a putting on a great show right now, but I doubt it will last. Eddie simply has a few screws loose, and no singer that we’d pay to see could get along with him for long.

My teenagers have been putting me and the rest of our family through hell lately. Their antics have made me question my liberal outlook on life more than once. I often look at them and wonder where the innocent, good-hearted little kids I helped raise went, the ones who loved Barney and Beauty and the Beast, and their family members.

I’ve been a Hilary Clinton fan ever since I listened to the audio version of her last book. She’s for real and would make a great president.

Nuclear power is the answer to our energy problems. A concerted effort to dramatically increase our use of nuclear power coupled with a move to electric vehicles (Tesla, anyone?) could wean us off foreign oil. Then we could just let them kill each other and stay the hell out of the Middle East. I’m sick of spending American lives to protect our right to make the sheiks richer. The hysteria and ignorance that has surrounded the use of nuclear power for three decades now is threatening our national security and our posterity. Imagine with me a day where petroleum-based cars are a thing of the past, a quaint relic of years gone by much like the steam engine and the telegraph. Imagine being able to “fuel” your car via an extension cord in your driveway and being able to drive great distances without having to recharge. That future is there for the taking if we really want it.


A few parting quotes:

“I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they’ve always worked for me.” –Hunter S. Thompson

“I believe in the equality of man; and I believe that religious duties consist in doing justice, loving mercy, and endeavoring to make our fellow-creatures happy.” –Thomas Paine

“But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.” –Thomas Jefferson

“We are turning into a nation of whimpering slaves to Fear -- fear of war, fear of poverty, fear of random terrorism, fear of getting down-sized or fired because of the plunging economy, fear of getting evicted for bad debts, or suddenly getting locked up in a military detention camp on vague charges of being a Terrorist sympathizer.” –Hunter S. Thompson

“That God cannot lie, is no advantage to your argument, because it is no proof that priests cannot, or that the Bible does not.” –Thomas Paine

“In four short years he has turned our country from a prosperous nation at peace into a desperately indebted nation at war. But so what? He is the President of the United States, and you’re not. Love it or leave it.” –Hunter S. Thompson

“Richard Nixon looks like a flaming liberal today, compared to a golem like George Bush. Indeed. Where is Richard Nixon now that we finally need him?”–Hunter S. Thompson

“The most formidable weapon against errors of every kind is reason.” –Thomas Paine

“Nixon was a professional politician, and I despised everything he stood for–but if he were running for president this year against the evil Bush-Cheney gang, I would happily vote for him.” –Hunter S. Thompson

“Every science has for its basis a system of principles as fixed and unalterable as those by which the universe is regulated and governed. Man cannot make principles; he can only discover them.” –Thomas Paine

“Our civil rights have no dependence on our religious opinions, any more than our opinions in physics or geometry.” –Thomas Jefferson

“He who is the author of a war lets loose the whole contagion of hell and opens a vein that bleeds a nation to death.” –Thomas Paine

“I do not find in orthodox Christianity one redeeming feature.” –Thomas Jefferson

“[The clergy] believe that any portion of power confided to me [as President] will be exerted in opposition to their schemes. And they believe rightly: for I have sworn upon the altar of god, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man. But this is all they have to fear from me: and enough, too, in their opinion.” –Thomas Jefferson

“He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.” –Thomas Paine

“I will not attack your doctrines nor your creeds if they accord liberty to me. If they hold thought to be dangerous - if they aver that doubt is a crime, then I attack them one and all, because they enslave the minds of men.” –Robert Green Ingersoll

“It is an affront to treat falsehood with complaisance.” –Thomas Paine

“Is uniformity attainable? Millions of innocent men, women, and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined, imprisoned; yet we have not advanced one inch towards uniformity. What has been the effect of coercion? To make one half the world fools and the other half hypocrites.”–Thomas Jefferson

“My country is the world, and my religion is to do good.” –Thomas Paine

“Every GOP administration since 1952 has let the Military-Industrial Complex loot the Treasury and plunge the nation into debt on the excuse of a wartime economic emergency. Richard Nixon comes quickly to mind, along with Ronald Reagan and his ridiculous 'trickle-down' theory of U.S. economic policy. If the Rich get Richer, the theory goes, before long their pots will overflow and somehow 'trickle down' to the poor, who would rather eat scraps off the Bush family plates than eat nothing at all. Republicans have never approved of democracy, and they never will. It goes back to preindustrial America, when only white male property owners could vote.” –Hunter S. Thompson

“One good schoolmaster is of more use than a hundred priests.” –Thomas Paine

“Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call to her tribunal every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because, if there be one, he must approve the homage of reason rather than of blind-folded fear. Do not be frightened from this inquiry by any fear of its consequences....If it end in a belief that there is no god, you will find incitements to virtue in the comfort and pleasantness you feel in its exercise and in the love of others it will procure for you.” –Thomas Jefferson

“A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong gives it a superficial appearance of being right.” –Thomas Paine

“Jesus! How much more of this cheap-jack bullshit can we be expected to take from that stupid little gunsel? Who gives a fuck if he's lonely and depressed down there in San Clemente? If there were any such thing as true justice in this world, his rancid carcass would be somewhere down around Easter Island right now, in the belly of a hammerhead shark.” – Hunter S. Thompson on Richard Nixon's life after resignation

“When men yield up the privilege of thinking, the last shadow of liberty quits the horizon.” –Thomas Paine

“Did you see Bush on TV, trying to debate? Jesus, he talked like a donkey with no brains at all...It was pitiful...I almost felt sorry for him, until I heard someone call him ‘Mr. President,’ and then I felt ashamed.”—Hunter S. Thompson on Bush’s 2004 debate performance

“We have it in our power to begin the world over again.” –Thomas Paine

“All we have to do is get out and vote, while it’s still legal, and we will wash those crooked warmongers out of the White House.” –Hunter S. Thompson

“It is necessary to the happiness of man that he be mentally faithful to himself. Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving, it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe.” –Thomas Paine

+ See the rest of the post

- Hide post details

Stepping outside for a smoke

or those of you who frequent this blog, this is just a little note to let you know that I’m stepping out for a smoke. Many of you know that I write professionally and that I have another book in the works. For some time, I’ve felt that I’ll likely never finish the book so long as my creative Jones is being satisfied by this blog. So, I’m putting the blog on hiatus for the next three months. I won’t be adding any new posts or responding to comments during that time. If you urgently need to reach me, use the email link at the right. I’ll try to hook back up with you around December 15th.

For those who visit this page via your web browser, I highly suggest you get yourself an RSS reader and subscribe to the blog instead. That way, you’ll get a notification when I start posting again. IE and Firefox both feature RSS subscriptions, as does Google’s personal homepage, iGoogle. Nearly all blogs provide RSS feeds, and you can subscribe to them rather than manually visiting them via your browser. If you’d prefer a standalone RSS reader, I recommend RSS Bandit. It’s the one I use. Alternatively, subscribe to my mailing list via the link on the right, and I’ll send out a note when I come back.

Sorry to run out on you, but this book will be my ninth and needs my full attention. I’ve enjoyed our exchanges and will come back as soon as I can. Wish me luck, and I’ll catch up with you down the road.

+ See the rest of the post

- Hide post details

Is infidelity wrong?

I once caught an Oprah show where a guy was hawking a book entitled, How to Cheat on Your Wife and Not Get Caught. Naturally, the book caused some controversy, especially given the audience. He had no sooner finished the interview with Winfrey than there was a line of women a mile long at the guest microphone, each with her hands planted firmly on her hips and mad as hell. He patiently endured their wrath for the next half hour or so as one after the other told him off in no uncertain terms. It was quite comical. I sat their wondering, “What did you expect, you fool?”

A conundrum facing people who don’t believe in absolute morals is whether something like infidelity, which has traditionally been viewed by civilized society as wrong, really is wrong if no one is hurt or even knows about it. Atheists often remind people that atheism is not a morality framework—you need humanism or something else for that. As I’ve said before, atheism is simply the absence of belief in a deity. But assume for the moment that you’re an atheist-humanist and that you gauge the wrongness of an act in terms of the harm or hurt it brings to others. Is infidelity wrong?

Given the title of this blog, you might think that I’d be an expert on infidelity, but not so. This is just something I’ve pondered often—not because I want to cheat on my significant other, but because it is a conundrum commonly faced by people who refuse the shackles of the absolute morality (or immorality, depending on your perspective) detailed in books like the Bible. Following orders is easy; thinking for yourself is harder.

So, what say you? Is it wrong to cheat on your significant other provided a) they’d never find out about it, and b) no one else is hurt or harmed in any way. And, please, don’t give me the copout answer, “Yeah, but I’d know. I’d be hurt. My conscience would bother me.” That’s circular. Your conscience won’t bother you if you don’t believe it to be wrong, so we need to settle whether it’s wrong before we go listening to the little voices in our heads. Also, please don’t come back with the equally vapid, “Well, I’d be hurt if they did that to me, so, yes, it’s wrong.” You’d be hurt if you knew; remember the two qualifications I stipulated. What if they had casual sex with someone that meant no more to them than using a vibrator or blowup doll and you didn’t know anything about it? Is there any real difference in that case between another human bringing them to orgasm or a toy? Would it be wrong?

I’ve heard both Goldie Hawn and her daughter Kate Hudson say that people aren’t naturally monogamous, and a couple generations of men have thanked their lucky stars that they feel that way. They probably wish all women did. Is it wrong to follow your natural instincts and have sex every time the opportunity presents itself provided no one gets hurt?

+ See the rest of the post

- Hide post details

Atheism defined

Religionists like to equate atheism to the same type of faith-based position that belief in God is. They often try to claim that it’s merely the flip side of the theism coin. But atheism is the complete absence of belief, not a negative belief based on similarly incomplete evidence. The distinction is subtle, but important. If believing in God is the equivalent of a positive account balance, atheism is not a negative balance or even a zero balance. It is not having an account at all.

+ See the rest of the post

- Hide post details

Suck it, Jesus

My friend Temple Whore speculates that it was Kathy Griffin's “Suck it, Jesus” remark rather than what she said right before that: “...no one had less to do with this award than Jesus.” I’m sure she’s right. I’m sure that’s regarded as even more offensive. One question: if she’d said instead, “Suck it L. Ron Hubbard,” would that have been met with such outrage? What about, “Suck it, Krisha”--would that have had a similar result? If we’re going to let people thank Jebus, let’s let them unthank him, too. Kathy’s not representing anyone but herself with those remarks, and she should be allowed to say whatever she wants vis-à-vis handing out accolades for her Emmy. Sure, it pisses religious people off, but she has a right to thank/unthank whomever she wants, in the same away that every other award winner does.

+ See the rest of the post

- Hide post details

Flimflamboyant Benny Hinn Exposed

CBN' The Fifth Estate did a bang-up job recently of exposing con artist-cum-televangelist Benny Hinn. Check out the episode link here, which links the entire documentary.

+ See the rest of the post

- Hide post details

Lady M.

I was disappointed to learn today that my friend Lady M. has shut down her Bitchasaurus blog. She’s a past Site of the Week winner here on my blog and one of my favorites. One of the things I really liked was how she so adeptly mixed science with unbelief and a good pinch of humor. She has her reasons for doing this and will definitely be missed. In her honor, here’s a post that you might have expected to find on Bitchasaurus. The photos and data are courtesy of another friend of mine, who appears to have gotten them here.

Click the play button at the bottom to play an MP3 that I think is particularly appropriate.

Top Ten Photos of the Hubble Space Telescope

R.I.P. Bitchasaurus.

+ See the rest of the post

- Hide post details

So many Tuesdays ago

It was a Tuesday morning, as regular a Tuesday as there’d ever been. I was getting ready for work, about to walk out the door and head for the office. I walked through the living room and saw the story breaking on TV: one of the World Trade Center towers had been hit by a plane. They didn’t know what kind of plane. They didn’t know if anyone was hurt. They didn’t know whether it was intentional.

Then, as I stood there watching, another plane flashed across the screen and hit the other tower. Many of my questions were answered instantly. It was a commercial jet. It was definitely intentional. Lots of people were killed. Lots more would be.

What caused 9/11? George W. Bush would have us believe that 9/11 happened simply because a few fanatics oppose our protecting our interests in the Middle East. The religious right thinks Satan was behind it. Some nutballs think the Jews orchestrated it. A few others think that covert U.S. government agencies were somehow to blame. Nonbelievers generally chalk it up to a combination of religious zealotry and misguided U.S. policy. Whatever the cause, the effect was earth-shattering and probably permanent.

Fidel Castro is a tyrant, a brigand, and a hypocrite, but he is no fool. When asked in 1978 by the House Select Committee on Assassinations whether Cuba had anything to do with the assassination of President Kennedy, Castro astutely pointed out that such an attack “would have been the most perfect pretext for the United States to invade our country, which is what I have tried to prevent for all these years, in every possible sense.” That wisdom was lost on Osama bin Laden, whose Al-Qaeda infrastructure was virtually obliterated by the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan. Al-Qaeda may have recovered somewhat and reformed in the outlying reaches of Pakistan, but it once had an entire country under its domain, and that is over.

Regardless of what you think of the invasion of Afghanistan, surely you would agree that the subsequent war in Iraq—ostensibly fought for some of the same reasons—has not enjoyed the same degree of success. We can argue over whether the war itself was just, but surely we can all agree that no one wanted the protracted mess with which we are now left. Surely we can agree that our government led us to believe that the war would be far shorter and simpler than it has turned out to be. Surely we can question the wisdom of continuing to pump lives and money into such a quagmire.

I think this all goes back to the President and the leadership he demonstrated (or rather the lack of it) in the wake of 9/11. He characterized the attacks as a clear-cut attempt by those bad old Muslims on the American way of life. He led the American response (and thereby the world) down a reactionary, xenophobic path. He framed the conversation in terms of a war on the ever-elusive “terror,” a time to go on the offensive and attack those who might attack us before they do so.

It is fortuitous that JFK, when faced with a similarly harrowing crisis one Tuesday in 1963, took a different path. Faced with the knowledge that the Soviets were deploying nuclear missiles 90 miles from our shores, Kennedy worried that invading Cuba would result in another world war. The Soviets would presume “a clear line” to conquer Berlin, and U.S. allies would think of us as “trigger-happy Americans” who lost Berlin and started a war because they could not peacefully resolve the missile crisis. The naval blockade that Kennedy instituted on Tuesday, October 23, 1963 (and which went into effect at 10 a.m. the next day) probably saved the world. It prevented an all-out confrontation with the Soviets and avoided painting them into a corner from which war was the only respectable outcome. It also forced them to remove the imminent threat of the missiles themselves and had the added benefit of removing the (largely superfluous) American missiles in Turkey. That wisdom was lost on George W. Bush, who has now bogged his country down in what may end up being the most costly war in human history. The war has already cost more in terms of actual dollars spent than World War II, our most expensive war prior to the Iraqi conflict, and will end up costing more than all of our wars combined by the end of the year (in actual dollars, not inflation-adjusted dollars). Long-term, it may very well end up being the most expensive war ever, even taking inflation into account.

So, for me, 9/11 is a case study in unheeded wisdom on both sides. It is a showcase for what a deadly mix arrogance and ignorance make, a fine example of being condemned, as Spanish-American philosopher George Santayana said, to repeat the mistakes of the past because we cannot (or we choose not to) remember it. In that vein, I will tell you what I wished Bush had said in the immediate aftermath of the attacks. Here’s the leadership I wish he’d shown:

“My fellow Americans, events such as these threaten to turn us against one another. They threaten to assault the freedoms for which we have fought so long and so hard. Let us not give the terrorists what they want. Let us not encroach on our own liberties in the interest of protection from the terrorists. That is what they want. They want us to put bars on the windows. They want us to carry guns. They want us to fear one another, to look at each other with suspicion, to break the bonds that unite us.

Abraham Lincoln said, ‘A house divided against itself cannot stand.’ I am here to tell you that at this moment in our history, unity is the order of the day. We stand on the precipice of our fate. The very future of democracy and the free world hangs in the balance. Will we choose violence or peace? Will we be baited into unjust warfare for the sake of safety? Will we become the thing we hate because we have allowed the terrorists to get to us? Or will we turn these attacks, this heinous tragedy, into humanity’s finest hour? Will we lead by example and demonstrate to the world and to our posterity that democracy does indeed work? Will we show that we are a nation of justice, of fairness, and of goodwill? Will we show that America is about freedom and opportunity and peace? I challenge you to stand with me this day, to unite with your fellow citizens all across this great land in showing the would-be terrorists that they cannot scare us. We will not run. We will continue to live freely. We will continue to do what we think is just and fair, to serve our interests, those of our allies, and of our brothers and sisters around the world. United, we will continue to persevere ‘with malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right.’

We will bring those who did this to justice. They will be tried in our courts. They will answer for every crime they’ve committed, for every life they’ve taken. We will hunt them to the ends of the earth. They cannot run. They cannot hide. These cowardly, dastardly deeds will go down in infamy; these thugs will rue they day they ever thought of these hateful attacks. We will find them. And they will pay for what they’ve done to this great country. I promise you that.

I also promise you that I will not allow these attacks to impinge one bit on our freedoms. We will refuse to be any less American today than we were yesterday, the terrorists notwithstanding. Should they have the right to redefine what it is to be an American? I ask you: Should they have the right to change our values? Do you want to give people who hate your very existence the ability to pilfer away your hard-won freedoms? I do not! And I vow before you and before God this day that our freedom will go on, stronger than ever! I will lay down my life to protect your rights and those of your children. The greatest danger we face today is not from outside our borders; it is from within. The greatest danger is that we allow ourselves to be terrorized by the terrorists, that we allow ourselves to be frightened into ceding our liberties in the interest of safety. Let me tell you something: safety without liberty is not safety at all, for after awhile the heart of man, which yearns to be free, will rebel against that which imprisons it; the people will rise up and smash the shackles of oppression into a thousand pieces. Living free is the natural state of humankind, and I swear before you, as God is my witness, I will not allow your freedoms to be usurped in any way.

To that end, I urge you to reach out to your fellow citizens and unite with them and with me in the fight for freedom. Embrace your neighbors—regardless of color, creed, religion, or gender—and reflect on how fortunate we all are to enjoy the blessings of liberty. Join hands with your Muslim brothers, your Jewish brothers, your Christian brothers—and all the rest—put aside your differences and unite with me in the fight for freedom. Do not let these attacks divide us—let them unite us. Dare to live your life boldly and rightly. Dare to dream the dream of freedom and to share that dream with everyone around you.

I will announce further actions in the coming weeks. In the meanwhile, keep the faith. Join me in bringing these criminals to justice and in ensuring that we do not allow ourselves to become un-American as we do so. Let us each cherish liberty, honor the victims, and work together to ensure that nothing like this ever happens again. Goodnight to you all, and may God bless America.”

We have changed so much as a nation since the September 11^th attacks that we are precariously close to time in America being demarked in terms of “pre-9/11” and “post 9/11.” History will not be kind to us if we do not figure out a way to live safely without infringing on basic civil liberties. If the only way we can find to be safe is to drift precipitously close to totalitarianism, we are no better than the many world powers that came before us, and democracy is doomed.

+ See the rest of the post

- Hide post details

Religious censorship is alive and well

In case you were wondering, religious censorship is alive and well in America. Witness Kathy Griffin, who won an Emmy for her show “My Life on the D-List” and had the temerity to say this in her taped acceptance speech:

“…a lot of people come up here and thank Jesus for this award. I want you to know that no one had less to do with this award than Jesus.”

O the shame!

The Academy of Television Arts & Sciences responded curtly:

“Kathy Griffin's offensive remarks will not be part of the E! telecast on Saturday night.”

Sigh.

A question for you dimwits at the Academy: What if Kathy had said,

“…some people might come up here and thank Scientology for this award. I want you to know that nothing had less to do with this award than Scientology.”

Or:

“…my Buddhist and Hindu friends might see this award as karma because good is always eventually rewarded with good and evil is always eventually rewarded with evil. I want you to know that I don’t believe that, and nothing had less to do with this award than karma.”

Or:

“…a lot of people might come up here and thank their parents for this award. I want you to know that no one had less to do with this award than my parents.”

Or:

“…my ex-boyfriend always said that he couldn’t create art unless he was stoned. I want you to know that nothing had less to do with this award than drugs.”

Would you still feel the need to censor her? Someone would be offended no matter who she attempted to exclude from the effusiveness. Who are you to decide who deserves to be offended and who doesn’t?

Shame on you, Academy, for this draconian and backward oppression. Kudos to you, Kathy, for having the courage to speak your mind.

+ See the rest of the post

- Hide post details

Wife Spanking, Part Tres

As Pagan has helpfully pointed out, there's more to this wife spanking business than may at first appear. Turns out Leah, one of the ladies whose blog I excerpted, actually markets CDD porn. She calls her novels, short stories, etc., CDD "romances." I call bullshit. Abuse and romance are fundamentally incompatible. As Pagan says, it's hard to pity her when she's making money from CDD, but it's a complicated situation.

I wonder just how many others regard this as a perverted form of kink. Perhaps Brian Flemming was closer to the mark than I realized, but I still feel sorry for Leah and her fellow abuse victims. Books or not, I'd still like very much to get Leah out of her CDD situation. Regardless of whether she profits some from it, she's still being abused. Writing about it--even positively--doesn't change that. She must have zero self-esteem to allow herself to be treated this way. Reading her blog on Amazon, I feel the overwhelming urge to toss my cookies--it's truly sickening. Here's a link to a book of some of her "romances."

The problem, it seems, is that too few people are speaking out about this. That's why you've got three posts on it from me. I'm not obsessed with it, but I feel a duty to say something--women (and their children) are being abused--ritually--and few seem to think there's anything wrong with that. I predict that if Leah could ever enjoy a relationship with a man who wouldn't beat her, she'd never go back to CDD. The tragedy is that so many of these victims of abuse have never known a life without it. They have come to think it's completely normal, and that is the saddest fact of all.

+ See the rest of the post

- Hide post details

In defense of Larry Craig

irst, let me begin by saying I don’t condone hypocrisy, and I’m well aware that Craig has voted right down the line with his fellow Republican hate mongers. Yes, I know it’s hypocritical to bash gays and be gay yourself, so he is, at the very least, a hypocrite. But let’s dig a little deeper, shall we?

What did he do? He solicited sex in a public restroom. Evidently, the practice is to touch feet, then proceed on to hand signals if things go well. Let’s review what happened. An officer camped out in a stall and did what officers do best: sat on his ass for an extended period of time. He was evidently there to help rid the world of those who might use the restroom to engage in lewd behavior or “hook up” to engage in it elsewhere. Craig’s foot touched his. Think about that for a minute. Just how wide would the officer’s “stance” needed to have been in order for a person in the next stall to touch it? Speaking for myself, it’s rare for me to even be able to see one of my neighbor’s feet, let alone be able to touch it with mine. I’d think they’d have to intentionally put it near the stall wall in order for me to do so. That’s what I think the officer did. He hung out his poisoned bait and simply waited for someone to take it.

When Craig tapped the officer’s shoe, the officer could, of course, have moved it away—like any normal, non-interested person would have done. If someone ever did that to me, I’d reflexively move my foot. Heck, I might even say, “Excuse me,” thinking that I’d somehow caused the collision. Had that happened, this incident would have gone no further. But, of course, the officer didn’t do that. He was too busy getting ready to swoop in for the kill.

Why are we so interested in preventing this particular type of lewd behavior? Is it that hetero men are complaining about being propositioned so much or that we consider any sort of homosexual activity to be particularly lewd? I’m thinking it’s the latter. What exactly is wrong with two consenting adults having sex in a restroom stall or meeting in a restroom and having it elsewhere? Granted we might prefer they’d go elsewhere, but is it really that big of a deal? But for his hypocrisy, I have no issue with what Craig did and think this whole thing has been blown out of proportion. If this were Europe, it would still make the news, but there’d have been no resignation over it.

Let’s be honest here: it isn’t just “lewdness” that the officer was attacking—it is homosexuality and its many frightening overtones and ramifications to John Q. Republican. Jerry Falwell believed that 9/11 was God’s judgment on America for, among other things, tolerating gays. Pat Robertson says something hateful along those lines about once a week. According to evangelical Christians, men hooking up with men in a restroom is an abomination in God’s sight. It’s even worthy of death according to the Apostle Paul. If Craig had been caught soliciting sex from an undercover female officer in some red light district somewhere, they’d still profess outrage, but far fewer would be calling for his head. This is as much about homophobia as it is about so-called “lewd” conduct.

Regarding his hypocrisy, I’ll say only this. Repression begets hypocrisy. Our society represses homosexuality and sexuality in general. Craig would have found it difficult to get elected and stay in office were he to admit that he was gay or enjoyed gay sex. Idaho is not Massachusetts, and Craig is not Barney Frank. I still find his hypocrisy loathsome, but I do understand it. Out of the sexual crucible that is modern-day America come all sorts of ironic and deformed creatures—walking oxymorons and perpetual dichotomies who are not even sure of who they are. The Frank Rule notwithstanding, I understand the hypocrisy even if I hate it.

+ See the rest of the post

- Hide post details

Offbeat Sexuality

I've been recently researching what I like to call "Offbeat Sexuality"--sexuality in (cultural) places you would not normally expect to find it, particularly those related to religion in some way (and, no, I don't mean in a men's restroom stall, Senator Craig). Two of my more interesting finds have been sex & witchcraft (thanks Temple Whore!) and sex & Mormonism. Who knew witches and Mormons could be such horndogs? I'll come back to the Mormons later, but check out Red Witch's Sexy Witch blog for some titillating photos of sexy witches, commentary on witchcraft and sexuality, etc. I don't know about you, but I always thought of witches as old hags. I couldn't have been more wrong. Red Witch demystifies all this on her blog--check it out.

+ See the rest of the post

- Hide post details

Four-Star General Blasts Bush Enemy Combatant Policy

“It is amusing to recall that we fought the revolution in defense of the rights of man and the civil war to abolish slavery and have now gone back on both principles.” –George S. Patton, General (four-star), Army of the United States

Patton was actually speaking of Eisenhower’s very similar “disarmed enemy forces” policy regarding German prisoners of war. Didn’t know about that one? Following World War II, Eisenhower relabeled some one million German POWs “disarmed enemy forces.” He did this in order to skirt the requirements of the Geneva Convention related to feeding POWs. In a March 10, 1945 message, Eisenhower proposed that German POWs be re-termed disarmed enemy forces because providing the level of rations required by the Geneva Convention “would prove far beyond the capacity of the Allies.” His proposal was approved, and adequate food, water, and shelter were withheld from German prisoners. In order to cover his tracks, the United States then forbade the Red Cross to inspect its 200+ POW camps—the only Western Ally to do so. Essentially, Eisenhower didn’t feel like he could afford to follow the rules, so he changed them.

Concurrent with this name game, the United States handed over hundreds of thousands of German POWs to the Soviets for use in forced labor camps. It also refused to accept the surrender of German troops in Saxony and Bohemia and handed them over to the Soviets, as well. Stalin demanded at least 4 million German workers to help repair the damage inflicted by the German invasion of the Soviet Union. Although this provision was not officially a part of the Potsdam conference, it was implemented anyway, and as of 1947, over 4 million Germans were being used as forced labor inside the Soviet Union. These included the POWs transferred by Eisenhower to the Soviets, the German POWs captured by the Soviets, and a large number of German civilians. “Forced labor,” in case you missed it, is slavery. Patton spoke out against this and was eventually relieved of his command as post-war governor of Bavaria over it.

So, you see, the seeds of Bush’s use of the “enemy combatant” designation were sown when W himself was in diapers—in the frenzied aftermath of the greatest liberation effort in human history, an historical irony if ever there was one. Bush’s gambit is a similar ploy to skirt the rule of law and notions of common decency. Enemy combatants are denied the right to due process, to right to retain an attorney of their choosing, the right to trial by a jury of their peers, and many other basic rights and freedoms that people in civilized society take for granted. A recidivist child molester in Miami has infinitely more rights than some Arab teenager held 90 miles south at Guantanamo Bay who was caught sleeping in the wrong house at the wrong time.

I’m with Patton on this one. It strikes me as hypocritical to tout the superiority of our brand of democracy and the fact that we believe in certain inalienable rights for all people regardless of nationality, then turn around and flout those very principles by willfully breaking our own laws and tromping all over these supposed inalienable rights. How can we call life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness ‘inalienable’ when we’ve shown time and again that we’re quite willing to ‘alienate’ these rights from whomever we please? Would not this whole Guantanamo Bay situation have been a stellar opportunity to demonstrate how fair and just the American system of government really is? Instead, we’ve behaved no better than our enemies. We have become the very thing we hate.

+ See the rest of the post

- Hide post details

Site of the Week: Atheist Hussy

his weeks' Site of the Week is Atheist Hussy, a creation of Intergalactic Hussy. I like AH because of the large variety of the media and the excellent quality of the articles. IH is evidently a graphic artist by day and does some great original artwork for the site. She also tracks down great articles and artwork elsewhere on the web and links them on her site for those of us who are too lazy to run them down ourselves.

IH graciously lets me display some of her work here (check out her revolving slide show in the right pane), and I've always admired her ability. Her stuff is quirky, aesthetic, and thought-provoking. She's a true artist. Stop by Atheist Hussy, and tell IH I sent you.

+ See the rest of the post

- Hide post details

Evening shadows grow long for Shrub

Yippee! We're finally down to less than 500 days left for Shrub. 499 days from now someone else will be in the White House, and it will almost certainly be an improvement. See the Bush countdown in the right pane, along with the daily Bushism, if you want to start counting the days yourself.

+ See the rest of the post

- Hide post details